Tempted to point out someone else's errors? I've learned the hard way the best policy is to bite my tongue and shut my mouth. Why is this so hard for me to do? Especially since there is always a chance I'm the one who is wrong.
Those of us who have adult children already know we're likely to encounter eye rolls at best when we tell them what to do. I've come to love my father's comment: "I don't hesitate to give advice to my daughters, because the chances of them hearing it, let alone taking it is so remote it can't possibly hurt them.
That said, I'll skip the kids and stick to the wisdom or folly of pointing out errors in another person's writing and give a few pointers as to how to do it well, and when to abstain completely. Here's some examples of when I waded right in when I should have abstained or used some common sense:
1. Dial it down. (This was huge) My third mystery, Hidden Heritage, was riddled with errors. I was livid and mortified. I fired off a three page letter to everyone at the press, detailing every single mistake and gave ample proof that the copy I sent had been pristine. It was perfect. It turned out the overworked editor had not sent the corrected galley to the printer. I generated a lot of ill will because of my flaming indignation. I should have dialed it down. My agent was appalled at how I handled the situation. Ironically, Kirkus Reviews singled it out as one of the best mysteries, and one of the best fiction books of 2013.
2. Don't assume they want help. A friend sent me a novel asking to use my name as a reference when he was scouting for an agent. I foolishly read his book and gave a lot of advice on how to improve the book. He didn't want my advice. He wanted to use my name as a reference. Period. This was a tough one. I could see at once the need for structural changes and was dying to help.
3. If they already know, shut up. I recently took it upon myself to tell our priest that a website link in our bulletin was wrong. That was silly. It was probably the umpteenth time someone mentioned it. No need to rub it in.
Only the other hand, there have been a number of times when I've managed to shut up because of intuition. A young woman with a great voice brought me a novel that I could have improved a lot. I didn't say so. She'll be fine. She had an MFA and it was the wrong time in her life to hear criticism.
Thinking about this post, I didn't point out some copy errors to one of my favorite magazine editors. The stakes were too high. Some other reader will do this for me. In the meantime, I want to keep publishing with this house.
Ironically, when I pointed out an error to Dr. Quintard Taylor at BlackPast, it helped my reputation as a careful academic. The Kansas African American, E.P. McCabe, usually signed papers with these initials. An article on the website referred to him as Edwin. I proved his name was Edward. How? I found his signature on the form granting him authority to be a Justice of the Peace. Victory! But historians are another breed of cat.
There's an error on a plaque at the prestigious, stunning Charles Russell Museum. Should I tell them? Probably. On the plague beside the Fire Boat picture there's a reference to "sing language." I'll bet it should read "sign language."
The problem with errors is that we can't see our own mistakes.
There are errors in this post. I've gone over it several times. I can't see any. Go right ahead and have at it loyal readers. That's what our comments section is for.
2 comments:
Oh, Charlotte, I do this for a living, and I too have learned to shut up and mind my own business instead of taking on the full-time unpaid job of correcting every error I encounter.
I did blast the editor of one publication that ran a short piece I had written, after the piece had been accepted and I had approved the proof. Along came the printed issue, and right over my name was an incorrect comma that some unknown flunky had inserted after the copy left my hands. Not an optional comma, mind you, but a glaring error of a kind that is condemned by every usage book I know. My professional pride took over, and I complained bitterly but received no reply. All this kerfuffle over a comma? You bet.
As you say, historians are another breed. I am even now framing a very muted and respectful query to the author of a wonderful, well-researched, and well-written work of history concerning a "little" factual error with big implications, which I suspect most readers will have overlooked. (Honest, folks, I hardly ever do this.)
My apologies to this fine community for going on and on. Next time I'll hold myself to a one-line comment (if I can) and try to avoid abusing your patience.
Anna, I would love to have you contact me by email. charlottehinger@comcast.net
There's something I want to discuss with you.
Love the comment on the "little" error. I've had readers catch of couple of historical errors in my mysteries that were really egregious. It was too late to take them back, and I was so terribly sorry.
Post a Comment