by Thomas Kies
I recently started reading a traditionally published mystery novel. About fifty pages into it, I had to stop. The dialogue was killing me. It was painfully bad. It was stiff, wooden, and much too formal. Everyone was making a speech.If you’re a writer, listen to people talk with each other. Really listen.
Real people don’t speak in polished sentences and paragraphs. They interrupt each other. They circle back. They change subjects when something gets too close to the truth. Good fictional dialogue mimics that rhythm—but with purpose. It's controlled chaos.
On the page, dialogue should do three jobs at once: reveal character, move the story, and keep the reader leaning forward. Miss one, and the whole scene starts to feel like two androids talking.
Technically correct, maybe even stylish—but lifeless.
In mystery writing, dialogue carries even more weight. Isn’t it evidence? Every word is a fingerprint, every pause a hesitation worth noting, a clue. People lie. They deflect. They say too much when they’re nervous and too little when they’re afraid. Let the reader hear all of that without announcing it.
Don’t over-explain. Show, don’t tell. If a character says, “I’m angry with you,” you’ve already lost the scene. Anger doesn’t introduce itself like that. It leaks out in weird ways.
“Funny how you remembered to call now.”
That’s anger. Or maybe resentment. Or sarcasm, or maybe something deeper. The point is, the reader gets to participate. They lean in, interpret, and engage. That’s where the magic happens.
Subtext is a cunning accomplice. It’s the thing riding beneath the words, steering the conversation somewhere the characters may not even realize they’re going. In a good interrogation scene, for example, the detective and suspect may not be talking about the same thing. One is asking questions. The other is answering a different set entirely.
And then there’s voice.
Every character should sound like they own their words. A seasoned reporter will speak differently than a nervous witness. A career criminal won’t frame a sentence the same way a suburban accountant does—unless he’s trying to, and then that becomes interesting in its own right.
Read your dialogue out loud. It’s the fastest way to spot what doesn’t belong. If you stumble, your reader will too. If it sounds like a speech instead of a conversation, cut it. Tighten it. Let silence do some of the work.
Because silence is part of dialogue.
The pause before an answer. The question that doesn’t get answered at all. The moment when a character chooses to walk away instead of speaking. Those are lines just as surely as anything in quotation marks.
And for heaven’s sake, stay away from adverbs. He said angrily. She cried sadly. They shouted excitedly. Show action instead. Show what your character is doing.
In the end, good dialogue is about tension. Not necessarily loud, explosive tension—but the quiet kind that sits between two people who both know more than they’re saying. That’s where stories live. That’s where readers stay up too late, turning pages, trying to catch what’s hiding in plain sight.
I know that if I can write that—if I can make the reader hear what isn’t being said—I’m not just writing dialogue. I’m telling a story.
