Wednesday, July 23, 2025

Moral Rights

 by Sybil Johnson

Not long ago Penny Publications sold AQMM, EQMM, FS&F, Analog and Asimov’s to the new consortium Must Read Magazines. The staff remains the same and supposedly it’s business as usual for these magazines.You can read more about it here.

There has been discussion on SMFS (Short Mystery Fiction Society) about changes to the contracts when they buy stories, in particular the addition of a moral rights clause where the author agrees to waive them for the story. 

Moral rights? What the heck is that? I’ve never seen one in a contract, not that I’ve had many. Apparently, others in SMFS hadn’t either so it created a stir. 

Moral rights is not the same as a morality/morals clause. Here is SFWA’s description of moral rights: “an author's right to control the integrity and attribution of their work, even after they have transferred copyright ownership.” Basically, the right to have your name on a story and the story published as you wrote it. A morality or morals clause concerns the right of the publisher/movie producer, etc., to cancel all connection with the writer/performer for immoral conduct. So quite different.

Writer’s Beware has a nice article on what a writer needs to know about moral rights. Quite an interesting read and too long for me to summarize. A must read for writers. There’s something called the Bern convention that covers it. While the US became a signatory to it in 1988, there is no provision in US copyright law for moral rights. Apparently, Congress decided the patchwork of laws at the state and federal level were adequate. Later, copyright law was modified to include moral rights, but only for visual art.

This situation created enough of a stir that Must Reads decided to remove moral rights clauses from its standard contracts. Here’s the SFWA’s press release on the subject;

Has anyone had any experience with a moral rights clause in a contract? Did you sign it? Did you think it was a deal breaker?

7 comments:

Type M for Murder said...

Thanks for the head's up. "Moral right?" Yikes, yet another thing for us writers to worry about.

Sybil Johnson said...

I'm glad you think this was useful. I'm still trying to wrap my head around why a publisher would want an author to waive those rights.

Shelley Burbank said...

Ugh, more buyouts and changes in the industry. Hopefully the magazines will continue to publish stories. As for moral rights...I've never heard of it, but by getting rid of it does that mean they can publish your work without attributing it to you? Like in an anthology? I'll go to the link you provided. Thanks!

Anonymous said...

Are moral rights less of a thing in the US than in Canada? I definitely had heard of them and had some idea of what they were. I'm not a copyright lawyer (or any kind of a lawyer), though as a librarian I have had to stay up to date in developments in that field. Lesley Ellen Harris offers a good summary here:
https://www.lawnow.org/moral-rights-in-canadian-copyright-law/

Sybil Johnson said...

More afoot on this. From Writer Beware on why a publisher would want an author to waive the moral rights clause. "Usually for two reasons: to ensure that the publisher and its licensees don’t have to identify the author every time the work is reprinted or otherwise licensed; and to ensure that they can make changes or adaptations without having to seek permission or deal with the possibility that the author might object (for example, removing or altering content that a particular country or market might consider objectionable, in order to sell the work into that country or market)."

Sybil Johnson said...

The latest on the Must Reads controversy https://writerbeware.blog/2025/07/25/contract-controversy-and-change-at-must-read-magazines/

Sybil Johnson said...

The main difference I can see between the US and Canada regarding moral rights is that they are in Canada's copyright laws, but not in the ones in the US. At least that's my interpretation as a non-lawyer.