Be True to Yourself

By Catherine Dilts

I’m anxious to start writing a new series. It’s been on my mind for a couple of years now, and darn it, I want to start writing the books.

Instead, I am carefully outlining books one through three. This is taking far longer than I expected. I know the beginning and the end. What’s the holdup?

I’ve been struggling to find the right tone. So much depends on exactly what type of story I envision. When I began veering into a darker telling of my tale, it felt wrong.

Collins Cemetery in Willow Lake, South Dakota

Was I failing to be true to myself?

Most of my novels and short stories have a cozy mystery tone. What does that mean? The generally accepted elements defining a cozy are: an amateur sleuth mystery set in a small community. There is no on-stage violence or sex. The tone is light. There may be humor. If an animal companion is involved, it will be featured on the book cover. The ending is reliably happy. The mystery is solved. The bad guys or girls will receive their just punishments.

Why would I veer away from such a comfortably optimistic universe?

Insecurity. Cozy mystery authors don’t receive the same respect in the literary world as thriller authors. Like romance authors (the ever-enduring most-read fiction genre), people writing cozy mysteries sometimes suffer from insecurity. Am I really an accomplished author when I don’t receive the recognition of other genres?

What’s keeping me from writing in a sub-genre getting more respect? Or stepping out of mystery genres entirely, and tackling a top-shelf women’s fiction series, or literary crossover?

South Dakota cornfield

You might think writers creating bright, happy worlds are living charmed lives. You would be wrong. Sometimes, creating a safe community (aside from the occasional murder) is the writer’s attempt to find a safe space in fiction that doesn’t exist in her reality. Solving the crime at the end of the story is a way to bring order to a chaotic and frightening world.

Not that I believe writers in other genres live charmed lives, and seek adventure through their fiction. Not at all. I suspect some thriller and horror authors embrace their worlds as a way to kill the demons in their real lives.

The basis of most cozy mysteries is that there will be light after the dark, and the dark won’t be too scary or oppressive. Edge-of-your-seat tense, but not lie-awake-at-night terrifying. Our own personal realities are likely much harsher. If I’m guilty of wanting to escape reality, I embrace that charge, along with the millions of readers hoping to disappear into an uplifting tale for a few hours.

Right now, I’m reading a very light series, Annie’s Museum of Mysteries. The lives of the characters may be a touch unrealistic, but I treasure the simplicity of their world. I know what I’m going to get, and it’s going to be fun.

During the outlining phase of my new project, I decided that I don’t want to turn my small town into a horror show of blood and despair. I want a safe harbor from scary reality. The trilogy may not fit the cozy mystery category precisely, but it will have that feel.

I need to stay true to myself and my writing voice.

Johnny's Fake Affair

 By Charlotte Hinger

Our occasional Type M Contributer and editor of Roundup, had a terrific column about his dealings with a fake bestselling romantasy novelist. I have his permission to post it here. 

Judging Others' Stories

 by Sybil Johnson

Sorry for the late posting. I've been so busy getting ready for Malice Domestic that I completely forgot it was my turn to post. As I mentioned a few weeks ago, I'm moderating a panel at the convention so I've been busy reading books by the panelists and coming up with questions.

I found Steve’s post on judging a short story contest interesting. Doing something like that does take up a lot of time. I’m not super comfortable judging other peoples’ works. I know what I like and what I don’t like. To a certain extent you have to set all that aside when you’re judging for awards.

I've been a judge for an award that I will not name for a few years now. It’s my way of giving back to the mystery community that’s given me so much over the years. It's been interesting. I've read books that I wouldn't normally read and enjoyed them. I’ve read others that I haven’t cared for. 

The hardest thing for me to do is forget about my likes and dislikes and judge the book on its merits. There are certain crimes that I don't like to read about and, under normal circumstances, I’d put the book down and move onto something else. You can’t really do that when you’re judging for an award. 

Judging criteria includes things about the beginning of the book, the characters, the mechanics like grammar, the setting and dialogue, the plot and pacing and the voice. Lots of stuff to think about. I usually take notes as I go along.

Judging is tough. It takes a lot of time. But I also pick up ideas along the way on how to make my own stories better. 

Malice Domestic: If you’re at Malice, I’m moderating MUSEUM MACGUFFINS: Art & Artifacts in Mysteries. On the panel are Lynda Allen, D.R. Ransdell, Lane Stone and Jeff Tanner. It’s Sunday morning at 9 a.m. Should be fun and interesting. And I should be completely adjusted to the 3 hour time zone difference by then!

Judging a short story contest

   Be careful what you volunteer for. True, it's a great way to get involved in something. It feels good to contribute, and volunteers are always desperately needed by groups and organizations.

   I am a member of the Private Eye Writers of America (PWA). I didn't publish a PI story in 2025, so I was clear to volunteer to judge short stories for their annual award, the SHAMUS. Stories must have been published in 2025 by a mystery fiction publication, either paper or online, paid or not. We didn't specify the range of words allowed, like 1000-7500 words, just the author's judgment on whether their story is a short story (novels are 75,000 and up, usually 90,000 to 200,000). Maybe next year we'll specify a tighter range. Is it fair to judge a 1000 word story against a 15,000 word story?

   The only basic requirement is that the story must involve a Private Investigator. The story could have a PI as the main character or be about an incident involving a PI that is talked about, but the PI never actually appears in the story.  The three judges have two months to read the stories and to agree on the Top Five.

   OMG!  I must have 75+ stories to read! As short as 1500 words, as long as 15,000. 

 metaphoric image

   Authors submit an easy-to-read printed copy, double-spaced.  Editors send us short story anthologies, paper-bound books, sometimes nominating every story in the volume. How will I read all these pages? There isn't enough time to read every story slowly, carefully, and still lead a normal life. So I speed-read and down-select.

   I have learned to scan down the page with enough depth to catch the character and the plot. I read closely enough to follow the plot and to appreciate the story, and then I make a quick judgment: does this story go on the tall "good try" pile or does it go on the much smaller "read again" pile?

   I reread every story's opening more than once - openings are critical to a page-limited short story. The best openings get into the story immediately, no "elegant writing" to show off your MFA degree, hit the main character, the situation, and the principal obstacle as early as possible. OK, you're allowed to write well and to be interesting because skeletal writing isn't engaging to read, but get into the story Now.  If you can do it with clever word play, just-enough description, meaningful action, and a motivating plot in the first page or two, all the better.

   Endings must be justified by the story. Some are cliché. Many are too quick. Some linger too long. A great ending will satisfy the emotional needs of the story. The guilty are usually punished, but not always. If not, the reason must "work".

   Two weeks in, I'm about 50% read. No story has gripped me, but there are a few on the short pile. Next, I tackle the stories sent in printed books.

   But, Oh No! The editors of Ellery Queen and Alfred Hitchcock just sent a box of almost every issue of their monthly magazines from 2025, each with 2 to 3 nominated stories! The hill just got a little steeper.

Twice Orphaned, Thrice Determined

by Catherine Dilts

What’s an author to do who gets orphaned, finds a new family, then is orphaned once again?

Hint: Quitting is not an option.

Back in 2012, I was enamored with traditional publishing. I hadn’t been able to acquire an agent. I was thrilled when my debut novel, Stone Cold Dead: A Rock Shop Mystery, was accepted by Five Star. They also published the second in that series, Stone Cold Case.

After sending in the third book, Stone Cold Blooded, there was a long silence. Crickets. The news finally came. Five Star dropped their mystery line. Not me personally. I was merely in the wrong place at the wrong time. They had been shedding genres like a bird molting in spring. Their romance line had previously gone away. Now their entire stable of mystery authors went poof overnight.

My mystery novels were now orphans.

Fast forward to a new opportunity. Encircle Publishing adopted many Five Star orphaned authors. We were delighted to have our series continue in a traditional publishing model.

Book three in my Rock Shop series had found a home. Then my new series, titled A Rose Creek Mystery, achieved publication of books one and two. I sent in book three, and was met with an uncomfortably familiar silence.

All good things seem to end. The creative and kind folks at Encircle faced a brutal financial reality. They made the decision to switch to a “hybrid” model. Meaning authors would pay for services (cover, editing, formatting) to have their books published. Not a vanity press. Not self-publishing. It’s perfectly fine, in my view, if you understand what’s at stake.

Having my second series orphaned after two books, I was ready to go it alone. Not entirely alone. My daughter Merida Bass declared she had no interest in trad publishing. She had witnessed my journey from the sidelines. We co-authored two books in a YA series that doesn’t fit the angsty, adult-ish tone of current YA. We knew it would be a hard sell to a trad publisher. And we started on a series whose pitch captured attention and interest.

A ninja kidnaps senior citizens and places them with families in need of a grandparent.

We both had a very good feeling about this project. In an informed and researched decision, we decided to skip seeking the traditional route and try self-publishing.

I couldn’t abandon my Rose Creek series. I requested my rights back from Encircle, which they swiftly and graciously returned. This orphan had self-emancipated.

Rose Creek book three, The Body in the Hayloft, released in December 2025. When my Encircle rights reverted to me for The Body in the Cornfield, book two vanished from the usual sales outlets. Book one is still available via Harlequin Worldwide Mystery, having been farmed out by Encircle in their final days as my publisher.

Yikes. Yes, it’s complicated.

I realized my series isn’t a series if books one and two aren’t available. I edited book two, The Body in the Cornfield. Why not? We have to redo everything, so I needed to do everything possible to improve the story before re-releasing. My daughter will create new cover art, and we’ll publish the novel this summer. This fall, book four, The Body in the Chuckwagon, will be released. When book one becomes mine again, we’ll do the same.

So much work. Editing. Cover art. Book design. Formatting. Getting the books up online. Hand-selling to libraries and bookstores.

Is it worth it?

Have you ever watched a televised series that is cancelled midstream? Like the cult classic Firefly, or the high-stakes thriller The Old Man. The dissatisfaction level at incomplete series? High!

I don’t want to leave readers feeling like the characters in my novels simply . . . stopped. Fell off the edge of a suddenly flat earth.

More important to me, I don’t want to feel like I left something undone.

At this point in my life, the best route to completion is this experiment in self-publishing. I don’t have to be an orphan anymore.

 

 

Dialogue---It's More Than Just Talk

 by Thomas Kies

I recently started reading a traditionally published mystery novel. About fifty pages into it, I had to stop.  The dialogue was killing me. It was painfully bad. It was stiff, wooden, and much too formal.  Everyone was making a speech. 

If you’re a writer, listen to people talk with each other.  Really listen. 

Real people don’t speak in polished sentences and paragraphs. They interrupt each other. They circle back. They change subjects when something gets too close to the truth. Good fictional dialogue mimics that rhythm—but with purpose. It's controlled chaos. 

On the page, dialogue should do three jobs at once: reveal character, move the story, and keep the reader leaning forward. Miss one, and the whole scene starts to feel like two androids talking.
Technically correct, maybe even stylish—but lifeless.

In mystery writing, dialogue carries even more weight. Isn’t it evidence? Every word is a fingerprint, every pause a hesitation worth noting, a clue. People lie. They deflect. They say too much when they’re nervous and too little when they’re afraid. Let the reader hear all of that without announcing it. 

Don’t over-explain. Show, don’t tell. If a character says, “I’m angry with you,” you’ve already lost the scene. Anger doesn’t introduce itself like that. It leaks out in weird ways.

“Funny how you remembered to call now.”

That’s anger. Or maybe resentment. Or sarcasm, or maybe something deeper. The point is, the reader gets to participate. They lean in, interpret, and engage. That’s where the magic happens.

Subtext is a cunning accomplice. It’s the thing riding beneath the words, steering the conversation somewhere the characters may not even realize they’re going. In a good interrogation scene, for example, the detective and suspect may not be talking about the same thing. One is asking questions. The other is answering a different set entirely.

And then there’s voice.

Every character should sound like they own their words. A seasoned reporter will speak differently than a nervous witness. A career criminal won’t frame a sentence the same way a suburban accountant does—unless he’s trying to, and then that becomes interesting in its own right.

Read your dialogue out loud. It’s the fastest way to spot what doesn’t belong. If you stumble, your reader will too. If it sounds like a speech instead of a conversation, cut it. Tighten it. Let silence do some of the work.

Because silence is part of dialogue.

The pause before an answer. The question that doesn’t get answered at all. The moment when a character chooses to walk away instead of speaking. Those are lines just as surely as anything in quotation marks.

And for heaven’s sake, stay away from adverbs.  He said angrily.  She cried sadly.  They shouted excitedly.  Show action instead.  Show what your character is doing. 

In the end, good dialogue is about tension. Not necessarily loud, explosive tension—but the quiet kind that sits between two people who both know more than they’re saying. That’s where stories live. That’s where readers stay up too late, turning pages, trying to catch what’s hiding in plain sight.

I know that if I can write that—if I can make the reader hear what isn’t being said—I’m not just writing dialogue. I’m telling a story.

Hard-Boiled, Soft-Boiled, Cozy, or Classic?

by Shelley Burbank

Apparently Amazon KDP Cares . . . When It Suits Them

My little novella, which has sold some copies since January (but nothing spectacular as anyone can see by checking out the best-seller rankings for both ebook and print versions,) caught the attention of Amazon KDP the other day, somehow. And not in a great way. 

For those of us who self-publish our books or have some say in how our small press publishers categorize our books, figuring out the "right" categories for Amazon is a bit daunting. Put your book in too wide a category and you have zero, absolutely zero chance, of being ranked where potential readers could actually discover you organically. You need to find categories into which your book DOES fall, but which are sub-genres, a bit more granular on the meta-data side of things. If your books don't neatly fall into a sub-sub-genre, you have a bit of a problem on your hands.

I use Publisher Rocket to look at potential categories. It's helpful, but not without some landmines, as you can see in this example. 

My Olivia Lively books are private detective fiction. That's a pretty wide category. They aren't cozy, though the style of writing and the Maine coastal setting kind of fit cozy. However, cozy mysteries, by definition, involve AMATEUR sleuths--not professional investigators, police detectives, FBI, or forensic specialists. 

So when it came time to pick categories, of course I chose Private Detective Fiction but didn't feel right picking Cozy Mystery. 

I picked Female Sleuth, as well. Another big category. 

Then I looked for a category that wasn't so crowded. I saw Hard Boiled Mystery and thought, "Hmmmm. Maybe..." I looked up the conventions. 

Private Detective? Check. 

Corruption plot? Check. 

Detective hired to do the dirty work of a suspect? Check. 

Morally-flawed detective character? Check. 

City setting? Half-check. (Portland is a city, but it's not exactly Chicago in the 40s).  

Male detective? Nope. First person? Nope. 

I thought this particular novella actually fit the hard-boiled detective bill pretty well. I would have called it Soft-Boiled Mystery (if such a category existed on Amazon) because a soft-boiled detective is usually a woman. From a post by writer Lisa DiSilverio: "The tone of a soft-boiled book is relatively light and sometimes veers into slapstick as in Janet Evanovich’s Stephanie Plum series." https://www.lauradisilverio.com/mysteries-hard-boiled-or-soft-boiled/

Here's the thing. When I wrote my first Lively, I looked for comp titles, and Stephanie Evanovitch's Stephanie Plum books came pretty darn close. So did Elle Cosimano's Finlay Donovan. These defy currenty categories, too, in my opinion. Finlay can be a "cozy" in that she's an amateur, but Stephanie Plum is a bounty hunter, in the biz but not a detective. There's not much else cozy about these books. They deal with gritty subject matter, but they are also humorous crime fiction. 

Each of our main characters are, however, female sleuths. And they have romantic interests. And they get into some hot water along the way. And there's some humor. And some high heels. 

I consider Olivia Lively to be soft-boiled detective fiction because a) she's a female b) she's a private investigator c) she deals in moral ambiguity d) she works in a city, not a cozy small town. 

So this brings me to KDP. I got an email from them yesterday saying they determined my choice of hard-boiled as a category was "misleading to readers" (like there's a lot of them being misled, eyeroll), and that they had removed my book from that category. The actual wording was, " . . . did not match the nature of the content, and may cause a misleading customer experience."

Normally this wouldn't bother me so much, but, BUT . . . I've seen so many books miscategorized in MUCH more egregious ways.

A quick look today at the top spots in Cozy Mystery yield a couple of actual cozies but not all. Here are the top five.

Marble Hall Murders by Anthony Horowitz (Also ranking #1 in crime THRILLER, Animal Mysteries, and Amateur Sleuth but I think it could be a cozy? At a stretch? It's not obvious from the cover, and I'm not sure cozy mystery readers would pick this up in a bookstore.)

Coming in Hot by Deany Ray (this is definitely a cozy vibe and cover)

Remarkably Bright Creatures by Shelby Van Pelt. (A NYTimes Best Seller and Read With Jenna book club pick. NOT a cozy vibe or cover. Too slick and NYTimes hardcovery--and now a Netflix tie-in. Though there is a mystery in it, it's not generally considered a mystery novel but more of a feel-good story.)

Flesh and Blood: A Kay Scarpetta Novel by Patricia Cornwell (Not a cozy. Professional investigator. Gritty. Dark. Bloody. It's in the title. MUCH more mis-categorized than my quiet little novella.)

Died in the Wool by Ngaio Marsh (Cozy title, cozy setting, but also a professional detective AND a classic, Golden Age of Mystery re-issue. It's more of a CLASSIC mystery or traditional detective mystery.)

There was a Sue Grafton Kinsey Milhone on the list at #20. (Another of my comp picks, and probably the closest, actually.) Kinsey's a private detective, not an amateur which is de riguer for cozies. Supposedly. Unless you are a famous author, a best-seller novelist, or have a big publisher behind you--then apparently, nobody cares. 

Now, least you think I wish any of these books or authors ill, I don't. In fact I kinda want to read all of them! 

It's Amazon's hypocrisy that bugs me. Categories are squishy. My "category mistake" was so less obvious than so many others, and it begs the question: Why are they picking on a basically undiscovered author doing her best to pick a category that isn't even that well-defined, not any more defined than ANY of these categories, anyway? Did someone "report" me? How did my little novella even get on the radar? 

Maybe It All Comes Down to the Covers

So, you might ask, what ARE the books allowed on the Hard-Boiled Detective Mystery list? 

You can go look for yourself, as I'm only going to talk about the ones at the #2 and #5 spots [as of this particular moment in time/date]. Enter the Martina Monroe Private Investigator "Crime Thriller" series by H.K. Christie. They are books in a series with a female private detective with flaws (her character's drinking and a DUI to my character's sorry taste in bad men) who returns to her hometown (a more cozy kind of set up). 

https://www.amazon.com/Best-Sellers-Books-Hard-Boiled-Mystery/zgbs/books/10468

These books look really good. What makes them different from my Olivia Lively books? Um, the dark covers? Maybe the writing style, but I can't tell that from the description, and neither can you or any of the so-called "misled readers." 

Another similarity? My novella is a literary mystery cold case. The #5 Christie book is a cold-case murder investigation. Okay, there are bodies, not books, at the heart of the Christie book. But are they really so different INSIDE? Again, I don't know how down and dirty these books get. I try to keep my books swearing and open-door-sex-scene free (because my parents read them and honestly? I don't think we actually need to rely on the crutches of foul language and sordid sex to get our points across. I take it as a personal challenge to talk about moral issues without getting "blue.") 

So HOW did my book even get on the KDP radar? Maybe they had AI search for swear words and bodily fluids and scan the cover for black and murky, and, not finding any, decided I'd miscategorized my book? 

I'll never know.

I Guess I Better Smarten Up

The lesson I'm learning here? After I'm finished with the Olivia Lively series, I'm going to make sure my books are firmly in a category, nothing squishy, nothing unique, nothing with one foot in two worlds. My covers will scream the category. My titles will scream the category. My metadata will line up precisely . . . somehow. It won't be by looking at the top books in the category, obviously, since that doesn't matter if you are a Jenna Book Club pick, NYTimes Bestseller, etc. Instead I'll scan the middle of the list and make sure my novels conform. 

I don't aspire to be a best-seller. I just want people to find my books. I thought Strawberry Moon had a better chance of getting eyeballs on it in a smaller category like Hard-Boiled Mystery, and since it ticked quite a few of the boxes, I went with it. So yeah, that category was probably a bad move based on my chick lit cover. It should have been black and muted, murky, and more "thriller" like, and probably readers looking for gritty, hard-boiled fiction wouldn't be attracted to my cute girl in sunglasses and the big pink moon on the cover. 

My bad, KDP! I'll do better next time. 

Has anyone else dealt with this issue? Drop a comment.  

Welcome, Judith Starkston, Author of Achilles's Wife

Judith Starkston

 Today, I (Donis) am proud to host Judith Starkston, author of Hand of Fire and Priestess of Ishana. Her fabulous new novel, Achilles's Wife, has just become available for purchase as of March 16.  Judy writes historical fantasy and mythic retellings set in the Bronze Age of the Greeks and Hittites. Her six novels bring women to the fore—whether Deidamia or Briseis from the Trojan War cycle of myths or a remarkable Hittite queen whom history forgot, even though she ruled over one of the greatest empires of the ancient world. Check out Judy's website at www.JudithStarkston.com.

Achilles’s Wife book cover image

The case of the Missing Mycenaean Palace: Setting Historical Fiction in Myth

My latest novel, Achilles’s Wife, arises from Greek myth and reinterprets the story of Achilles’s life before the Trojan War—when his divine mother conceals him on a remote Greek island to keep him out of the brewing Trojan War. But as a feminist novel focusing on female leadership and motherhood, its main character is a young woman, Deidamia (Mia), a princess on the Greek island of Skyros, daughter of King Lycomedes. 

Choosing a Royal Setting

Princesses and kings live in palaces or castles, of course, and a royal dwelling represents power and leadership, so it was important to me to “build” a palace that gave my overarching theme of governance—good and bad—a vivid physical rendering in the readers’ imaginations. 

Being the historian I am, I also wanted to be historically accurate for the Mycenaean, Late Bronze Age period when this mythic king and his daughter would have lived, if they were ever “real,” which they certainly could have been.

A Missing Palace

So, I found myself writing a novel set on the Greek island of Skyros because that is where, according to tradition, the myth I’d chosen took place. I soon encountered a problem as I researched this setting: the missing Mycenaean palace.

Archaeology from a Previous Era

There’s not a great deal published in scholarly research about the archaeology of Skyros. Moreover, the gorgeous archaeological site that has been excavated on the island, called Palamari, dates to the Early Bronze Age. Its final habitation is about 1700 BCE. I was aiming for somewhere more or less around 1250 BCE within the Late Bronze Age to be a credible palace for Lycomedes. But this is a mythic retelling, not precise historical fiction, so I used my knowledge of Mycenaean architecture and borrowed some of the vivid setting details from Palamari. Voila! A fine palace of Lycomedes.

Or so I thought. Then, deep into writing this manuscript, my husband and I decided we wanted to travel. Our last international trip had been pre-Covid. In about a month, I planned a trip to Skyros and Santorini. In the process, I tracked down a Greek archaeologist, Christina Romanou, who fairly recently had published about the Palamari site. I was looking for help identifying local people familiar with the dig. I have found such connections hugely helpful in my past research travels.

Locating the Missing Mycenaean Palace

Ms. Romanou was very helpful. She gave me names of people who’d worked on the dig and could be located at the archaeology museum or guarding the site. But more significantly for my novel in progress and my inner accurate historian, she told me about the likely location of Lycomedes’s palace. It turned out there was evidence of where a Mycenaean palace had once stood, whether the mythical king lived there or not.

Palace atop rocky mountain, medieval ruins visible (photo: author’s own)

Not Much Left

The Palamari site I’d previously focused on for the palace lies on the northerneastern portion of the island. Long before my characters would have arrived on the scene, the residents of this city abandoned it (possibly when a volcano-caused tsunami consumed a huge chunk of the settlement). My Mia and Achilles could explore the dramatic ruins of horseshoe-shaped bastions and stone walls. The site is so atmospheric that I incorporated this haunted city as a key location in my plot, even when I had to give up on it as the site of the Mycenaean royal seat. But Palamari did not solve my missing palace problem.

Also on the eastern coast, but toward the middle of the island, rises a steep, rocky mountain. It’s currently topped with Classical, Medieval, and Ottoman ruins and a still-functioning monastery. I’d never heard a word about a Mycenaean palace there. 

However, Ms. Romanou gave me the essential information. Soundings taken on the acropolis area of that mountain revealed Mycenaean ruins. The many layers of later use have wiped away any significant trace of this palace, but at least we know where it was. I spent hours climbing (600 steps or so from the base of the mountain, through village to acropolis) and crawling around the acropolis area where the soundings place a palace. I was ready to site my imaginary palace and citadel.

My Fictional Palace Becomes Real

Instead of a broad bluff over the sea, my novel portrays a rocky mountaintop location. Since my characters, early in the novel, do some illicit escaping from said palace, this took some major rewriting. There are, after all, many steps and dangerous heights to scale, although there is a lovely river valley cutting in midway from the facing mountain range, so Mia did not need to go all the way down to the beach.

 

But my rewriting developed in other unanticipated ways. I love to write from concrete details. I had been suffering from a sense of amorphousness of place. I don’t write as well without the inspiration of real locations: the smells, the sights, the textures, and the geographic realities. Finding the true location and spending a lot of time there in person ended up meaning even more to me than success in achieving historical accuracy. Myth retellings need to create a lifelike immersion. I felt this story becoming fully convincing once I held that rocky mountaintop on Skyros in my heart. 

Palamari site, “haunted” city with horseshoe bastion (photo: author’s own

The Novel, Achilles’s Wife

Here is a brief book description of Achilles’s Wife:

In an ancient kingdom, a princess takes inspiration from a visiting young woman to challenge her father’s views and reach for leadership—and then discovers her muse is a man. 

The goddess mother of Greek mythology’s most famous warrior, Achilles, will do anything to prevent her son’s fated early death. In a desperate move, she hides Achilles, against his will, on an island—disguised in a girl’s body.

Tormented by inner discord, the miscast “girl” befriends Mia, the eldest daughter of the island’s king, launching a transformation of Mia’s own. Armed with a new vision she believes comes from a girl, Mia contends with family secrets, a controlling father, her destiny to rule, and the wrath of a goddess. 

When fate reveals Achilles’s identity, a divine mother’s fury drives Mia and Achilles into marriage. Mia must navigate her love for a man with a divided heart and a dangerous measure of immortality. Balancing governance and motherhood, Mia will face an unbearable choice.

________

Achilles' Wife is available on Amazon, Bookshop, or at Judith's website,  https://www.judithstarkston.com/

To Edit Or Not To Edit, That Is The Question

 by Sybil Johnson

Fellow author Marla Cooper recently wrote a blog post about relaunching her Destination Wedding mystery series with the publication of Terror in Taffeta. (It's a good book.)

In the post, she mused a bit about how much to edit the book. One of these days I plan on getting the rights back for my first 5 books and re-releasing them with new covers. I’ve thought about how much I should edit them or whether I should edit them at all.

Certainly, I would correct any typos, though I don’t think there are any. My editor and were good at catching those things, but who knows, something might have slipped through.

The covers definitely have to be changed. I love the ones I have now. When I self-published the 6th book, I had the same artist who created the other covers create the new one so it would fit in with the look of the series. When I republish, though, I think I’ll have to change the look so the new editions are distinguishable from the old. I’ll be sad to see those old covers go, though. 

There is at least one continuity error between the books to do with a description of one of the buildings. I noticed it awhile back. I’ll go through all the books and correct the descriptions so they are consistent. 

Other than that, I don’t know if I should edit anything else. A part of me itches to “improve” my writing. But, I really think I should generally let them be. They are good stories and reflect my writing style at that time.

What do you all think? If you republish a book, what kind of edits would you make? Or would you let it stand as is?