By Charlotte Hinger
Our occasional Type M Contributer and editor of Roundup, had a terrific column about his dealings with a fake bestselling romantasy novelist. I have his permission to post it here.
Frankie Bailey, John Corrigan, Barbara Fradkin, Donis Casey, Charlotte Hinger, Mario Acevedo, Shelley Burbank, Sybil Johnson, Thomas Kies, Catherine Dilts, and Steve Pease — always ready to Type M for MURDER. “One of 100 Best Creative Writing Blogs.” — Colleges Online. “Typing” since 2006!
By Charlotte Hinger
Our occasional Type M Contributer and editor of Roundup, had a terrific column about his dealings with a fake bestselling romantasy novelist. I have his permission to post it here.
by Sybil Johnson
Sorry for the late posting. I've been so busy getting ready for Malice Domestic that I completely forgot it was my turn to post. As I mentioned a few weeks ago, I'm moderating a panel at the convention so I've been busy reading books by the panelists and coming up with questions.
I found Steve’s post on judging a short story contest interesting. Doing something like that does take up a lot of time. I’m not super comfortable judging other peoples’ works. I know what I like and what I don’t like. To a certain extent you have to set all that aside when you’re judging for awards.
I've been a judge for an award that I will not name for a few years now. It’s my way of giving back to the mystery community that’s given me so much over the years. It's been interesting. I've read books that I wouldn't normally read and enjoyed them. I’ve read others that I haven’t cared for.
The hardest thing for me to do is forget about my likes and dislikes and judge the book on its merits. There are certain crimes that I don't like to read about and, under normal circumstances, I’d put the book down and move onto something else. You can’t really do that when you’re judging for an award.
Judging criteria includes things about the beginning of the book, the characters, the mechanics like grammar, the setting and dialogue, the plot and pacing and the voice. Lots of stuff to think about. I usually take notes as I go along.
Judging is tough. It takes a lot of time. But I also pick up ideas along the way on how to make my own stories better.
Malice Domestic: If you’re at Malice, I’m moderating MUSEUM MACGUFFINS: Art & Artifacts in Mysteries. On the panel are Lynda Allen, D.R. Ransdell, Lane Stone and Jeff Tanner. It’s Sunday morning at 9 a.m. Should be fun and interesting. And I should be completely adjusted to the 3 hour time zone difference by then!
Be careful what you volunteer for. True, it's a great way to get involved in something. It feels good to contribute, and volunteers are always desperately needed by groups and organizations.
I am a member of the Private Eye Writers of America (PWA). I didn't publish a PI story in 2025, so I was clear to volunteer to judge short stories for their annual award, the SHAMUS. Stories must have been published in 2025 by a mystery fiction publication, either paper or online, paid or not. We didn't specify the range of words allowed, like 1000-7500 words, just the author's judgment on whether their story is a short story (novels are 75,000 and up, usually 90,000 to 200,000). Maybe next year we'll specify a tighter range. Is it fair to judge a 1000 word story against a 15,000 word story?
The only basic requirement is that the story must involve a Private Investigator. The story could have a PI as the main character or be about an incident involving a PI that is talked about, but the PI never actually appears in the story. The three judges have two months to read the stories and to agree on the Top Five.
OMG! I must have 75+ stories to read! As short as 1500 words, as long as 15,000.
metaphoric image
Authors submit an easy-to-read printed copy, double-spaced. Editors send us short story anthologies, paper-bound books, sometimes nominating every story in the volume. How will I read all these pages? There isn't enough time to read every story slowly, carefully, and still lead a normal life. So I speed-read and down-select.I have learned to scan down the page with enough depth to catch the character and the plot. I read closely enough to follow the plot and to appreciate the story, and then I make a quick judgment: does this story go on the tall "good try" pile or does it go on the much smaller "read again" pile?
I reread every story's opening more than once - openings are critical to a page-limited short story. The best openings get into the story immediately, no "elegant writing" to show off your MFA degree, hit the main character, the situation, and the principal obstacle as early as possible. OK, you're allowed to write well and to be interesting because skeletal writing isn't engaging to read, but get into the story Now. If you can do it with clever word play, just-enough description, meaningful action, and a motivating plot in the first page or two, all the better.
Endings must be justified by the story. Some are cliché. Many are too quick. Some linger too long. A great ending will satisfy the emotional needs of the story. The guilty are usually punished, but not always. If not, the reason must "work".
Two weeks in, I'm about 50% read. No story has gripped me, but there are a few on the short pile. Next, I tackle the stories sent in printed books.
But, Oh No! The editors of Ellery Queen and Alfred Hitchcock just sent a box of almost every issue of their monthly magazines from 2025, each with 2 to 3 nominated stories! The hill just got a little steeper.
by Catherine Dilts
What’s an author to do who gets orphaned, finds a new
family, then is orphaned once again?
Hint: Quitting is not an option.
Back in 2012, I was enamored with traditional publishing. I
hadn’t been able to acquire an agent. I was thrilled when my debut novel, Stone
Cold Dead: A Rock Shop Mystery, was accepted by Five Star. They also published
the second in that series, Stone Cold Case.
My mystery novels were now orphans.
Fast forward to a new opportunity. Encircle Publishing
adopted many Five Star orphaned authors. We were delighted to have our series
continue in a traditional publishing model.
Book three in my Rock Shop series had found a home. Then my new
series, titled A Rose Creek Mystery, achieved publication of books one and two.
I sent in book three, and was met with an uncomfortably familiar silence.
Having my second series orphaned after two books, I was
ready to go it alone. Not entirely alone. My daughter Merida Bass declared she
had no interest in trad publishing. She had witnessed my journey from the
sidelines. We co-authored two books in a YA series that doesn’t fit the angsty,
adult-ish tone of current YA. We knew it would be a hard sell to a trad
publisher. And we started on a series whose pitch captured attention and
interest.
A ninja kidnaps senior citizens and places them with
families in need of a grandparent.
We both had a very good feeling about this project. In an
informed and researched decision, we decided to skip seeking the traditional
route and try self-publishing.
I couldn’t abandon my Rose Creek series. I requested my
rights back from Encircle, which they swiftly and graciously returned. This
orphan had self-emancipated.
Rose Creek book three, The Body in the Hayloft, released in
December 2025. When my Encircle rights reverted to me for The Body in the
Cornfield, book two vanished from the usual sales outlets. Book one is still
available via Harlequin Worldwide Mystery, having been farmed out by Encircle
in their final days as my publisher.
Yikes. Yes, it’s complicated.
I realized my series isn’t a series if books one and two
aren’t available. I edited book two, The Body in the Cornfield. Why not? We
have to redo everything, so I needed to do everything possible to improve the
story before re-releasing. My daughter will create new cover art, and we’ll
publish the novel this summer. This fall, book four, The Body in the
Chuckwagon, will be released. When book one becomes mine again, we’ll do the
same.
So much work. Editing. Cover art. Book design. Formatting.
Getting the books up online. Hand-selling to libraries and bookstores.
Is it worth it?
Have you ever watched a televised series that is cancelled
midstream? Like the cult classic Firefly, or the high-stakes thriller The Old
Man. The dissatisfaction level at incomplete series? High!
I don’t want to leave readers feeling like the characters in
my novels simply . . . stopped. Fell off the edge of a suddenly flat earth.
More important to me, I don’t want to feel like I left
something undone.
At this point in my life, the best route to completion is this experiment in self-publishing. I don’t have to be an orphan anymore.
by Thomas Kies
I recently started reading a traditionally published mystery novel. About fifty pages into it, I had to stop. The dialogue was killing me. It was painfully bad. It was stiff, wooden, and much too formal. Everyone was making a speech.If you’re a writer, listen to people talk with each other. Really listen.
Real people don’t speak in polished sentences and paragraphs. They interrupt each other. They circle back. They change subjects when something gets too close to the truth. Good fictional dialogue mimics that rhythm—but with purpose. It's controlled chaos.
On the page, dialogue should do three jobs at once: reveal character, move the story, and keep the reader leaning forward. Miss one, and the whole scene starts to feel like two androids talking.
Technically correct, maybe even stylish—but lifeless.
In mystery writing, dialogue carries even more weight. Isn’t it evidence? Every word is a fingerprint, every pause a hesitation worth noting, a clue. People lie. They deflect. They say too much when they’re nervous and too little when they’re afraid. Let the reader hear all of that without announcing it.
Don’t over-explain. Show, don’t tell. If a character says, “I’m angry with you,” you’ve already lost the scene. Anger doesn’t introduce itself like that. It leaks out in weird ways.
“Funny how you remembered to call now.”
That’s anger. Or maybe resentment. Or sarcasm, or maybe something deeper. The point is, the reader gets to participate. They lean in, interpret, and engage. That’s where the magic happens.
Subtext is a cunning accomplice. It’s the thing riding beneath the words, steering the conversation somewhere the characters may not even realize they’re going. In a good interrogation scene, for example, the detective and suspect may not be talking about the same thing. One is asking questions. The other is answering a different set entirely.
And then there’s voice.
Every character should sound like they own their words. A seasoned reporter will speak differently than a nervous witness. A career criminal won’t frame a sentence the same way a suburban accountant does—unless he’s trying to, and then that becomes interesting in its own right.
Read your dialogue out loud. It’s the fastest way to spot what doesn’t belong. If you stumble, your reader will too. If it sounds like a speech instead of a conversation, cut it. Tighten it. Let silence do some of the work.
Because silence is part of dialogue.
The pause before an answer. The question that doesn’t get answered at all. The moment when a character chooses to walk away instead of speaking. Those are lines just as surely as anything in quotation marks.
And for heaven’s sake, stay away from adverbs. He said angrily. She cried sadly. They shouted excitedly. Show action instead. Show what your character is doing.
In the end, good dialogue is about tension. Not necessarily loud, explosive tension—but the quiet kind that sits between two people who both know more than they’re saying. That’s where stories live. That’s where readers stay up too late, turning pages, trying to catch what’s hiding in plain sight.
I know that if I can write that—if I can make the reader hear what isn’t being said—I’m not just writing dialogue. I’m telling a story.
There was a Sue Grafton Kinsey Milhone on the list at #20. (Another of my comp picks, and probably the closest, actually.) Kinsey's a private detective, not an amateur which is de riguer for cozies. Supposedly. Unless you are a famous author, a best-seller novelist, or have a big publisher behind you--then apparently, nobody cares.
Now, least you think I wish any of these books or authors ill, I don't. In fact I kinda want to read all of them!
It's Amazon's hypocrisy that bugs me. Categories are squishy. My "category mistake" was so less obvious than so many others, and it begs the question: Why are they picking on a basically undiscovered author doing her best to pick a category that isn't even that well-defined, not any more defined than ANY of these categories, anyway? Did someone "report" me? How did my little novella even get on the radar?
So, you might ask, what ARE the books allowed on the Hard-Boiled Detective Mystery list?
![]() |
| Judith Starkston |
Today, I (Donis) am proud to host Judith Starkston, author of Hand of Fire and Priestess of Ishana. Her fabulous new novel, Achilles's Wife, has just become available for purchase as of March 16. Judy writes historical fantasy and mythic retellings set in the Bronze Age of the Greeks and Hittites. Her six novels bring women to the fore—whether Deidamia or Briseis from the Trojan War cycle of myths or a remarkable Hittite queen whom history forgot, even though she ruled over one of the greatest empires of the ancient world. Check out Judy's website at www.JudithStarkston.com.
![]() |
Achilles’s Wife book cover image |
The case of the Missing Mycenaean Palace: Setting Historical Fiction in Myth
My latest novel, Achilles’s Wife, arises from Greek myth and reinterprets the story of Achilles’s life before the Trojan War—when his divine mother conceals him on a remote Greek island to keep him out of the brewing Trojan War. But as a feminist novel focusing on female leadership and motherhood, its main character is a young woman, Deidamia (Mia), a princess on the Greek island of Skyros, daughter of King Lycomedes.
Choosing a Royal Setting
Princesses and kings live in palaces or castles, of course, and a royal dwelling represents power and leadership, so it was important to me to “build” a palace that gave my overarching theme of governance—good and bad—a vivid physical rendering in the readers’ imaginations.
A Missing Palace
So, I found myself writing a novel set on the Greek island of Skyros because that is where, according to tradition, the myth I’d chosen took place. I soon encountered a problem as I researched this setting: the missing Mycenaean palace.
Archaeology from a Previous Era
There’s not a great deal published in scholarly research about the archaeology of Skyros. Moreover, the gorgeous archaeological site that has been excavated on the island, called Palamari, dates to the Early Bronze Age. Its final habitation is about 1700 BCE. I was aiming for somewhere more or less around 1250 BCE within the Late Bronze Age to be a credible palace for Lycomedes. But this is a mythic retelling, not precise historical fiction, so I used my knowledge of Mycenaean architecture and borrowed some of the vivid setting details from Palamari. Voila! A fine palace of Lycomedes.
Or so I thought. Then, deep into writing this manuscript, my husband and I decided we wanted to travel. Our last international trip had been pre-Covid. In about a month, I planned a trip to Skyros and Santorini. In the process, I tracked down a Greek archaeologist, Christina Romanou, who fairly recently had published about the Palamari site. I was looking for help identifying local people familiar with the dig. I have found such connections hugely helpful in my past research travels.
Locating the Missing Mycenaean Palace
Ms. Romanou was very helpful. She gave me names of people who’d worked on the dig and could be located at the archaeology museum or guarding the site. But more significantly for my novel in progress and my inner accurate historian, she told me about the likely location of Lycomedes’s palace. It turned out there was evidence of where a Mycenaean palace had once stood, whether the mythical king lived there or not.
![]() |
| Palace atop rocky mountain, medieval ruins visible (photo: author’s own) |
![]() |
| Palamari site, “haunted” city with horseshoe bastion (photo: author’s own |
The Novel, Achilles’s Wife
Here is a brief book description of Achilles’s Wife:
In an ancient kingdom, a princess takes inspiration from a visiting young woman to challenge her father’s views and reach for leadership—and then discovers her muse is a man.
The goddess mother of Greek mythology’s most famous warrior, Achilles, will do anything to prevent her son’s fated early death. In a desperate move, she hides Achilles, against his will, on an island—disguised in a girl’s body.
Tormented by inner discord, the miscast “girl” befriends Mia, the eldest daughter of the island’s king, launching a transformation of Mia’s own. Armed with a new vision she believes comes from a girl, Mia contends with family secrets, a controlling father, her destiny to rule, and the wrath of a goddess.
When fate reveals Achilles’s identity, a divine mother’s fury drives Mia and Achilles into marriage. Mia must navigate her love for a man with a divided heart and a dangerous measure of immortality. Balancing governance and motherhood, Mia will face an unbearable choice.
________
Achilles' Wife is available on Amazon, Bookshop, or at Judith's website, https://www.judithstarkston.com/
by Sybil Johnson
Fellow author Marla Cooper recently wrote a blog post about relaunching her Destination Wedding mystery series with the publication of Terror in Taffeta. (It's a good book.)
In the post, she mused a bit about how much to edit the book. One of these days I plan on getting the rights back for my first 5 books and re-releasing them with new covers. I’ve thought about how much I should edit them or whether I should edit them at all.
Certainly, I would correct any typos, though I don’t think there are any. My editor and were good at catching those things, but who knows, something might have slipped through.
The covers definitely have to be changed. I love the ones I have now. When I self-published the 6th book, I had the same artist who created the other covers create the new one so it would fit in with the look of the series. When I republish, though, I think I’ll have to change the look so the new editions are distinguishable from the old. I’ll be sad to see those old covers go, though.
There is at least one continuity error between the books to do with a description of one of the buildings. I noticed it awhile back. I’ll go through all the books and correct the descriptions so they are consistent.
Other than that, I don’t know if I should edit anything else. A part of me itches to “improve” my writing. But, I really think I should generally let them be. They are good stories and reflect my writing style at that time.
What do you all think? If you republish a book, what kind of edits would you make? Or would you let it stand as is?
My phone sends a nightly report of that day's screen time. Usually I'm around two hours and change. But that's screen time on my phone. Like most other writers, the majority of my screen time is at my laptop. While it's easy to complain about all the time we spend staring at screens, much has changed in how we consume information. Unless you're involved in physical labor--the trades, cooking, gardening--how else would you work?
According to Demand Sage, worldwide, the average person spends 6 hours and 54 minutes on screen time. While the time for Americans is 7 hours, 2 minutes, we are digital sloths compared to much of the world. South Africa leads at 9 hours, 24 minutes; Brazil is second at 9 hours, 13 minutes; Philippines at 8 hours, 52 minutes. Measured behind countries such as Colombia, Russia, Egypt, Mexico, Bulgaria, and Saudi Arabia, we in the USA clock in at number 19.
Discounting work, even if we wanted to limit screen time, it becomes a challenge. We get most of our news from the web, though what gets delivered is often throttled by search engines and we have to dig deeper to get past click-bait. The phone is a portable TV, so it's a convenient way to watch programs, movies, and videos. Then there's social media. Add gaming. On-line banking. Hooking up. Checking the weather. Scrolling through photos. Seems every business and venue wants you to download their app.
Even before AI, the phone became a crutch. City maps have practically disappeared and we rely on Siri to tell us how to get to our destination. Rather than hunt for radio stations on the car dashboard, Spotify delivers tunes based on our algorithms.
What we consume through screen time affects our mood, deliberately since the harder our emotional buttons are pushed, the more likely we are to engage with what's online and be rewarded with dopamine hits.
AI studies our engagement on an unprecedented scale and not just by documenting what sites we've visited, but by eavesdropping, sifting through our email and social media, mapping our locations, cataloging our photos, cross-indexing biometrics gleaned from smart watches and fitness trackers, reading our eyeballs whenever we're close to a camera. The level of surveillance we've embraced would astonish and certainly dismay George Orwell.
We've become so reliant on AI to tell us where we are, to remind us what to do, to nudge us about healthy options, to validate who we are, so that in a not-too-distant future, AI via the phone will tell us how to feel. Which brings me to my writer friend Nick Arvin, who embarked on an ambitious project on Substack to write and publish 52 short stories, one for each week of 2026. The stories have an off-center Twilight Zone mood, a bit creepy, not quite horror but definitely unsettling and worth reading. In this week's offering, Arvin presents "A Device For Feeling Feelings", describing how reliant people will become on their devices, to the point they're uncomfortable trusting their emotions without getting affirmation from AI, even in matters of romance.
One perk of writing historical mysteries is that I (Donis) get to live in a time and place that no longer exists, and believe things that no one believes any more. I think sometimes that there is something of acting in writing fiction. Actors and novelists both have to dig deep to inhabit our characters and make them real. Sometimes it takes research into people and ways of life one would never come across in her ordinary life, such as a former computer programmer-turned novelist like Vicki Delany inviting a police friend over to her house to teach her Close Quarters Combat, or actor William Hurt spending a couple of weeks in Angola Prison in Louisiana for a movie roll.
Author or actor, if you want your character to come alive, something inside you has to live her life with her.
I just wrote a scene in which one of my characters does something that he absolutely believes is right, and in the context of the story, he is right. But I, Donis Ann Casey, would NEVER consider justified. One of the joys and perhaps one of the great challenges of writing is that you can explore lives, places, times, people, attitudes that are entirely different from your own. The book I’m writing now features a protagonist who leads a life that couldn’t be less like mine, nor does she believe the things I do And yet I know her intimately. I grew up around her world and loved a lot of people who were just like her.
I wonder sometimes if readers think I have the same values and ideas as my protagonists. I always wondered how like their characters other authors are until I actually started writing fiction myself. Now I think the answer often is, “not even close.” I read an interview with Salmon Rushdie in which he said he didn’t have to be religious himself in order to understand quite well how a religious person thinks, and not only to understand him, but have great admiration for him.
That's how I feel about those who lived their lives in a world that no longer exists.
by Catherine Dilts
Here in Colorado Springs, we’re having a false spring. The
temperatures are setting records. However, it’s all a lie.
Any day now, we’ll get that crushing drop in temperature,
preferably combined with precipitation. Snow, please. But we’ll take whatever
we can get, as long as it's wet.
| Peonies and tulips think it's spring |
When the weather is bonkers, the trees and bushes leaf out
prematurely. Then the inevitable cold returns, causing branches to snap under
the weight of ice and snow. Oh no! My peonies and tulips are emerging! Go back,
before it’s too late!
The unusual weather is making writing difficult. Typically
this time of year, I can accomplish impressive writing sprints because I’m
still in hibernation mode, hunkered down in my writing cave. This season, I’m
struggling to stay focused on my computer screen.
I do write year-round. It shouldn’t be impossible for me to
be creative just because the sun is shining and the birds are singing. I do my
best work sitting on the deck in the morning as the sun rises, surrounded by flowers.
It’s not the same when the trees are leafless and the flower
pots bare. And a bit too chilly to sit outside in early morning temperatures of high thirties
to mid-forties. Spring is the time for hummingbird feeders, but I can’t put
mine out until the middle of April.
There are plenty of writing projects to keep me busy. Re-reading a Rose Creek novel final draft before submitting to
critique group. Providing feedback to a friend planning to pitch to an agent.
Hammering away on the outline for a new trilogy. Drafting the next
Ninja-Grandparent mystery.
I have to focus my energy. I’m finally getting my books
placed in stores. (Basecamp Books & Adventure, and a new "maker" shop Hidden Gems.) That will be wasted effort if I don’t continue to write books.
| Hidden Gems 5020 N. Nevada Ave. Suite 120, Colorado Springs, CO 80918 |
I’m reducing my gardening plans due to
those new additions. But I still hope to fill my grow boxes with flowers,
tomatoes, peppers, cucumbers, and basil. I started seeds yesterday. Gardening,
even a limited deck “farm,” keeps my mind busy with green dreams.
| Bird Watching |
Perfect. Peace and quiet. Time for a writing sprint.
I recently received these unsolicited emails.
Hello Thomas,
I’m reaching out on behalf of The Great Books Society of Denver, a lively community of 680 readers who meet monthly in Englewood, Colorado.
Your work, Random Road, came up in one of our recent discussions, and in true book-lover fashion, we thought: why not go straight to the source? The gritty realism, layered mystery, and complex humanity in your novel resonated deeply with our members. We would love to feature your book as our monthly pick, giving it exposure to an engaged, thoughtful audience who are genuinely excited to read and discuss new works.
Featuring your book with us provides direct engagement with a dedicated community of readers who love to discuss and recommend books, increased visibility among literary enthusiasts who value discovery and thoughtful conversation, and the opportunity for your work to become a memorable part of a month-long reading experience.
If this sounds like your cup of tea (or glass of wine, we don’t judge), please let us know, and we’ll share the next steps to make it happen.
Warm regards,
Organizer | The Great Books Society of Denver
So many compliments. By the way, in a follow-up email, they listed a tiered list of prices for their services. This wouldn’t be a scam, would it?
Hello Thomas Kies
Your book Darkness Lane was recently highlighted by one of our club members. Would you let us know if it’s available for our 7 Day Read Along and upcoming Club Literary Prize?
Organizer, Vienna English Club
Author scams are rampant. It was a topic of multiple discussions in San Francisco a few weeks ago while I was there attending Left Coast Crime.
Dan Berry recently wrote a column for the New York Times Book Review talking about scams. He said that one scammer had reached out to him claiming to be Margeret Atwood (full disclosure, I got one of those too). Berry contacted Atwood’s agent who wrote back saying, “Oh, this is so terrible and mean. Preying upon people’s hunger for success and/or their hope to improve their writing.”
What are some of the most common author scams these days?
• Fake Literary Agents/Publishers: Scammers pose as legit agents, offering publishing contracts in exchange for upfront "reading" or "editing" fees.
• Marketing and PR Scams: Companies promise Hollywood film adaptations, Netflix pitching, or massive marketing campaigns, often targeting indie authors.
• Vanity Presses: These houses demand high fees to publish, promising success but providing little to no real editing or distribution.
• Paid Review Scams: Offers to purchase "guaranteed" reviews on sites like Amazon or Goodreads, according to The Darling Axe.
• Impersonation Scams: Scammers use AI and LinkedIn/social media to impersonate well-known publishing professionals, often using using well-known, bestselling authors.
• Award/Contest Scams: Fraudulent literary awards that charge hefty entry fees
Why are these SOBs targeting writers? Dan Berry summed it up by saying, “…the victim’s vulnerability. A lonely heart yearns for love and companionship: an author yearns for sales and validation.
Yes, I know this is the second time I’ve published a blog about scams. I apologize. It’s just that I know there are people being cheated and it really cheeses me off. www.thomaskiesauthor.com
![]() |
| "Janice is Skeptical" by Shelley Burbank |
Following is a segment from my recent PINK DANDELIONS newsletter.
I may be delusional, but I’ve just done something so out of character, I can only think it’s either gonna be the smartest thing I ever did for myself or the stupidest. After forty years of autodidactic literary study, I signed up for a one-on-one writing mentorship program that will eat up the last bit of writing money I’ve earned and hoarded over the years, using it all in one last big spend.by Sybil Johnson
I’ll be attending Malice Domestic once again this year. For those who don’t know, it’s a mystery convention celebrating traditional and cozy mysteries. This is my 10th or 11th one or something like that. I’ve lost track over the years.
Malice is my favorite mystery convention. I look forward to it every year, even though it means a plane ride across the country and a 3 hour time difference. An added bonus is I get to visit the pandas at the National Zoo.
I’m particularly excited for this year since I know both the Guest of Honor, Annette Dashofy, and the Toastmaster, Ellen Byron. They’re both great writers and people.
I’ve been lucky to be on a panel every year I’ve attended as a published author. This time around I’m moderating a panel, MUSEUM MACGUFFINS: Art & Artifacts in Mysteries. On the panel are Lynda Allen, D.R. Ransdell, Lane Stone and Jeff Tanner. The topic is an interesting one. Should be quite fun.
I feel the role of the moderator is to keep the conversation flowing, ask interesting questions, and make sure everyone gets in on the conversation. In order to do this, I need to know about each panelist so I’m checking out their websites and reading at least one of their books. After all that, I should be able to come up with interesting stuff to talk about.
I had better get back to it.
For the full Malice schedule: https://www.malicedomestic.net/ Clicking on 2026 Schedule will bring up a pdf of the current schedule.
By Charlotte Hinger
I hate hate hate writing a novel synopsis. Curiously, I love writing query letters and judging by the reception I get, I'm good at this.
A novel synopsis is a totally different process. Mine sound dull and stilted. Like what you would write to a college professor or your grandmother. No phazazz.
A couple of days ago, I finished a synopsis of a historical novel for my agent. It was mediocre at best. My judgement, not hers.
Then inspired I turned to ChatGPT. I asked my new BFF if it could create a synopsis. "You bet," it replied eagerly. I uploaded my book--all 115,000 words. It created a wonderful sparkling synopis in seconds.
WOW!
Then I ran my mystery through this process with the same instruction: Create a one page synopsis. Again, a terrific result.
I would never write a book with ChatGPT. In fact, I'm so frustrated with Microsoft's CoPilot attempting to interfere when I write that I'm ready to tear my hair out. And yet, and yet--I find myself paying attention when it insists a comma is needed here or there. On the other hand, it doesn't understand the impact of incomplete sentences. Or phrases, or a whole bunch of other things involved in creative writing.
Thinking back, I've resisted adopting any new development regarding writing. I didn't want to give up my bouncey Royal portable typewriter that was a gift from my parents. When I switched to computers, I clung to my Apple 2e. Then I went through PCs at a record pace. These choices involved equipment, AI is in a different realm.
I've discoveredd I'm very superstitious. Those synopses!! It was just too easy. I'm a Kansan, after all. Our state motto is Ad Astra Per Aspera. To the Stars Through Difficulties. If it isn't hard, it doesn't count.
I wonder if I asked how my novel could be improved, what would ChatGPT say. Do I dare ask? Would I throw a hissy fit if I didn't like its suggestions and turn to Anthrotopic's Claude instead?
For that matter, I've questioned the HUGE number of five star reviews some authors have on Amazon. Are they for real? If I asked ChatGPT to post a thousand fawning reviews on Amazon, would it do it?
Does "it" resent not having a real name? Should I ask?
Over the course of my novel-writing career, it has occurred to me to wonder about the psychology of those of us who create whole worlds on paper and populate them with characters who do exactly what we want them to do. Are we indulging in self-psychoanalysis without being totally aware of it? I’ve often said that what readers say to me about my books tells me more about them than it does about the books. So I’d better admit that what I write says a lot about what’s going on in this unfathomable (to me) l brain of mine.
Things change in the course of a life, and what did the trick for you when you were younger may not fill the bill after a while, and time may come for a change. The one constant in my life has been the love of storytelling. I started writing short stories when I was very small. The first story I remember writing was about a girl who turned into a cat. It had pictures and everything. I was an English major in college, and have always been a prolific reader, but I always felt I had to be practical and concentrate on having a successful career, be self-sufficient, make a living. I surely did not want to end up like my mother, who drove herself crazy trying to be the epitome of a perfect 1950s wife and mother. So for the bulk of my life, my fiction writing was just for me. I have a trunk full of short stories dating from the early 1960s, but before I wrote my first mystery novel, all my published works consisted of professional articles, including a book on U.S. Government tax publications. I’m sure you remember. It was riveting.
I was always fairly successful at my various career endeavors, but I found none of them particularly fulfilling. It took me half a century to realize that maybe I really didn’t want to be a captain of industry or a leader of men. So the day came when I asked myself, Donis, what has always given you joy in your life? And I had to admit that I’ve always been happiest when I was telling a story.
So I took a leap. I sold my business and went home to write. And interestingly, the book I decided to put my heart into was entirely different than anything I had ever written before. All the books and stories I had written before had to do with cool people, usually unmarried, childless professionals, often scientists, always intellectuals, mostly messed up and angst ridden.
But this time I wrote a historical mystery series set in rural Oklahoma at the turn of the 20th century, featuring a farm wife with a very large family: Alafair Tucker, who couldn’t care less about cool. How I conjured up this character I do not know, for she could not be less like me. And yet she obviously is me to some extent, since she lives in my head.
Am I wish-fulfilling? I don’t have the slightest desire to romanticize her lifestyle. It was tough. Alafair lives the life I never did, or never could. I couldn’t abide it. However, it seems I imbue her with all the virtues and strengths I do not have. She knows what she knows and takes action. Then once she has, she doesn’t second-guess herself. I agonize over every decision and sometimes take no action at all. She’s kind and tolerant of human weakness. She takes care of everyone. She’s patient with the follies of others. Me: not so much. She’s a moderately well-adjusted mother of children, who doesn’t worry about her own shortcomings nor her place in the world, instead of what I am, which we won’t go into.
I never set out to deliver a message or make a statement when I write. I just want to tell a ripping yarn. However, every time I finish an Alafair Tucker novel I do find myself wondering what Dr. Freud would say about the story. Alafair is always much more successful at confronting her fears than I am. And she is never afraid to fail. She sticks herself out there.
For the first time in my fiction writing career, I created a character who isn’t hip or svelte or rich or independent or even particularly young. Or male. She goes against all conventional wisdom. Yet I had immediate success with Alafair’s first novel, The Old Buzzard Had it Coming. Why it couldn’t have happened when I was young and thin and beautiful I don’t know, but we come to our authentic place in our own time, I guess.
Maybe I want to spend time with Alafair because she reminds me of some of the women in my past whom I loved, but didn’t fully appreciate. She is funny, reflective, wise to ways of the world and the ways of kids, and a bit sad because of the losses in her life, like my own mother was. She’s the center of her family, loving and giving to a fault, adored by her children, and a legendary cook, like my late mother-in-law. With the best of motives, she’s all up in your business and can drive you crazy, too, like a relative of mine who shall remain nameless, lest she recognize herself (though she won’t. They never do.)
I may have created Alafair out of pieces of women I love, but she’s much more than the sum of her parts. The great British mystery novelist Graham Greene said, “The moment comes when a character says or does something that you hadn't thought of. At that moment, he’s alive and you leave it to him.” I first put Alafair on the page, but then she stood up and walked away, and now I just follow where she leads. And what that tells me about myself I do not know.
I have been really struggling with my current WIP, Sins of the Father, the thirteenth Inspector Green novel. The word count suggests I am three-quarters of the way through, which means I should have at least a vague idea how I'm going to "land this sucker". The last quarter of a book is all about catching all the balls I have tossed up in the air, pulling them together into a satisfying, dramatic climax, and tying together the loose ends. The central question of the story must be answered as well as most of the subordinate questions. I don't mind some ambiguity that leaves a few puzzle pieces unplaced, but it's a fine line between that and leaving readers dangling and frustrated.
But meanwhile, Sins of the Father is still out in the weeds, looking for direction. As I wrestled with the question "What next?", I realized that part of my problem is not knowing what my characters, especially my police characters, would be doing in the real world. I try to write reasonably realistic stories which means trying to follow proper police investigative procedures and avoiding having the cops make outlandish or frankly illegal moves. But in this book, I have embroiled them in a plot that involves them in situations outside their normal investigative protocols. I know a reasonable amount about police protocol, but in this story, I have ventured far beyond my comfort zone. I have rogue cops, secrets, cover-ups, and inter-jurisdictional complications with other police forces. It's the nature of the story I have developed, but I still want to preserve some appearance of realism. I don't want readers with some knowledge of normal procedure and acceptable conduct to throw the book at the wall in exasperation. Would such and such an action be grounds for dismissal? How much can an officer get away with? Would police forces keep secrets from each other without consequences? And so on.
I don't have answers to these questions as I plough ahead with the story, but I have a solution. Once I have finished the first draft the best I can, with fingers crossed it's not too outlandish, I hope to send the manuscript to a couple of retired police friends for their input. Both of them love mysteries and hopefully will be able to offer suggestions if I have bent credibility too far. It is fiction, after all, and some suspension of disbelief is acceptable in the interests of a good story. Sometimes it's a matter of setting up the motivations properly. Instead of thinking "Oh, he would never do that!", I can reframe the issue as "under what conditions might he do that."
I still don't know what should come next, but I have some idea of where I want to end up. I just have to figure out how to get there, and leave the realism aside for the time being. Trusting the cops will set me straight.
by Catherine Dilts
Why do I always imagine I can write while on vacation? This
trip had an added challenge. My husband and I have never traveled with pets.
We began on February 28 in Colorado. The plan was fairly
loose, with the only reservations being for a Grand Canyon campground on March
2nd. Maybe we’d find places to camp along the way. Maybe not. But we
were driving a new-to-us RV. Any place you can pull over and fit becomes an impromptu
campground.
Planning a winter camping trip, we figured we might not face
the intense crowds of summer travel in national parks.
Traveling with a forty-pound, seven-month-old English
Springer Spaniel and a two-month-old Humane Society rescue kitten had its
moments. A car-sick puppy, a kitty so tiny I was afraid he might get stepped
on.
I have noticed that my posts that include a photo of an
animal get more views and reactions than anything else I throw on social media.
Starting this Sunday, March 15, I’ll release one article a day for over a week
at https://substack.com/@catherinedilts.
These have nothing to do with my fiction work. They’re all about my experience of travel with
pets.
I’m kind of past caring whether my social media presence
sells books or not. If this venture isn’t about pure self-expression and having
some fun, then I don’t really want to engage any longer.
Writing about the stresses and joys of traveling with pets
has definitely been fun. The work of writing can roll along without me for a
few more days.
And roll along it does, with Grandpa’s New Year’s Relocation available now at Basecamp Books and Adventure, and in the usual places online. Grandma’s Valentine Abduction released on the first day of my vacation.
![]() |
| "Masquerade" by Shelley Burbank |
March has begun, and I'm wallowing and wading in my next Olivia Lively mystery. The first book was set in spring. The second in summer. The last one will be winter.
This third mystery will be an autumn tale.
Now, I love Maine in the fall, but it's a little difficult to feel that mood when living on a tropical island in Micronesia. I needed something to evoke woodsmoke rising from chimneys, pumkins decorating front porches, dusk falling quickly, the crunch of leaves beneath L.L. Bean boots, and all things Halloween. The answer? A "mood board" created on the front cover of the notebook I'm using to draft scenes, create character sketches, take notes on thematic elements needed for the plot, and synopses of chapters.
This particular book will find my main character, Liv, in her darkest place. Her character arc (why do I always want to write "arch?" A plot is a structure of sorts, a bridge, taking my heroine from "here" to "there," but it's symbolic not literal, like an archway. Of course, in literary terms, there is also ARC--Advanced Reader Copy) over the course of my planned four-book series makes the third installment the logical place for the Dark Moment. And autumn has all those dark, witchy, Halloween vibes, too. It fits.
Anyway, I love making collages. I make them for my personal journal covers, and this particular piece was a fun way to spend a morning/afternoon. I let my verbal brain take a break while I played with mood and vibe and color and voila! The result is how I want readers to feel when they read the book: a little edgy, a little creepy, but also the cozy "pumpkin spiciness" of Gilmore Girls. And Guam.
The idea for a certain plot/theme popped into my head while I was listening to a podcast episode about a goddess cult back in ancient Sumeria. That's actually all I'll say. I've typed more and deleted because I want no spoilers. Guam becomes a destination as Liv investigates the crime in Book 3, but whether or not it's a red herring I'll have to leave unanswered here. I'm not even TOTALLY sure myself what will happen here, but I'm pretty excited to share some of my current home with my readers.
And readers might not have to wait for the book to learn more about Guam because an idea for a short story (please, please, dear Muse, let it remain a short story) in the Olivia Lively world, but this time featuring her ASSISTANT/APPRENTICE, Marion! Yes, Marion is getting her own short story. I'm grateful to my Muse for gifting me with that brilliant idea. I already had the title from a t-shirt I found at a local tourist spot.
I'm going to attempt to make a piece of art based on the photo I took, and I'm hoping maybe it will be good enough for an illustration for the short story if I use it as a lead magnet for building my email list. (Of course current subscribers will also have access to it, and I might also load it up to KDP for a .99 purchase for people who don't want to give me their email address.)
The other option would be to submit it to a mystery magazine.
Which do you think would be more likely to attract new readers? A. Free short story in exchange for email sign up or B. publication in a mystery magazine
Let me know what you think because I really can't decide. Sometimes people sign up for freebies, then unsubscribe after they get the freebie. I'm hoping to find readers who actually enjoy my stories and want to read more of them. Which is the better option? Help!
Do YOU use vision boards for your life/work/writing? I'd love to hear more about that, too. Drop a comment!
by Sybil Johnson
I spent last week in Las Vegas, one of my favorite places to vacation. I’m not a partier, I just find it endlessly fascinating. Things are constantly changing on the Strip. Casinos come and go. Restaurants come and go. Shows come and go. The only thing guaranteed is that you’re going to walk and walk and walk.
![]() |
| Sunset over the Strip. The Excalibur casino to the left, part of the New York New York casino on the right |
It was nice to get away for a while. We went to several shows: Cirque de Soleil’s Ka, David Copperfield and a showing of the Wizard of Oz at the Sphere. The Sphere is, well, a huge sphere just off the strip near the Venetian. They have concerts there and show The Wizard of Oz. It’s an immersive experience. They cut out about 15 minutes from the original movie. It’s also processed so it seems 3-D and has occasional 4-D effects. Quite fun.
As I said, casinos come and go. The Mirage casino no longer exists. The new Hard Rock casino is being built in its place. Here’s the beginnings of a giant guitar.
The Flamingo is still around. They have a very cool bird sanctuary on the grounds which includes, yep you guessed it, flamingos.
We also went to the Arté museum, which is an immersive art experience. Well worth the visit.
Here in Southern California, we have driverless taxis called Waymos. They are modified cars. In Vegas, they have Zoox, which are vehicles that are made specifically to be robotaxis. There is no space for a driver, just space for passengers. Right now, they are in a test phase, giving free rides to limited places on the Strip. As soon as they get the go-ahead, they will start charging for the rides and, I would guess, go more places. You can read more about Zoox here.
All in all, it was a good trip. Now, back to work.